Refused your birth
certificate by the Adoption Authority? Click
here to learn how to locate it for yourself.
First ever agency audit
uncovers 50 cases of illegal adoption
By Conall Ó Fátharta
Irish Examiner, Saturday, October 01, 2011
THE first ever audit of the Adoption Authority’s records has uncovered
approximately 50 cases of illegal adoptions.
The Adoption Authority said it found 99 people who have identified
themselves as adopted, for whom it does not have a corresponding
Around 50% of these relate to so-called "adoptions" prior to
the introduction of legal adoption in 1952.
The remaining 50% point to "under-the-counter" adoptions which
were never formally approved by the Adoption Board, and may involve
cases where the birth registration of the child was illegally falsified
so to appear as the natural child of the adoptive parents.
"The authority intends to undertake further work to explore the
full extent of the issue. The board of the authority will then consider
possible next steps to contribute to an understanding of the issue,
including any advice to the minister.
"As you are aware, the authority has no statutory responsibility in
respect of the matter but is extremely sensitive to the issue,"
said a statement.
It is understood to be the first such audit of any of the AAI’s
records. It was announced in June of last year following the Irish
Examiner’s investigation into the case of Tressa Reeves, whose son was
illegally adopted and falsely registered as the natural child of the
adoptive parents without her consent. This was facilitated by St
Patrick’s Guild adoption agency in Dublin.
However, adoption groups have labelled the audit a cosmetic exercise and
say to uncover the true scale of illegal adoptions, the AAI must examine
the files of adoption agencies and files in the possession of the HSE.
The Adoption Authority has said it "has no statutory
responsibility" in respect of people who were illegally adopted as
it did not grant an adoption order.
However, the Irish Examiner is aware of at least one case where an
adoption order was granted, by the then Adoption Board, for the children
of married couples. This was not permitted under the Adoption Act. In at
least one case, that of Carol O’Keeffe, who was adopted in 1972, it
granted an adoption order without a birth certificate — the key piece
of documentation needed to grant an adoption.
Susan Lohan of the Adoption Rights Alliance said it was "tantamount
to gross negligence" for the authority to claim it had no statutory
"It has echoes of the former central bank regulator saying he did
not know what the banks were up to and we all know where that led,"
here to return to the news page
|“In all of us there
is a hunger, marrow-deep, to know our heritage, to know who we are
and where we have come from. Without this enriching knowledge, there
is a hollow yearning . . . and the most disquieting
Alex Haley, Author of Roots